[Go to Parent Theme] [Previous Page] [SEARCH] [DAILY OUTLINES]

Landuse and landscape

Thursday 3rd July: 16:00 - 18:00
2 hour session: 5-10 minute position papers followed by discussion to conclude

Melissa Goodman-Elgar (Washington State University)
Helen Lewis (University College Dublin, UCD School of Archaeology)
Charles Frederick (Independent Consulting Geoarchaeologist-Geologist)

Abstract

In this session, we will address the significant contributions of geoarchaeological research to the understanding of anthropogenic landscapes and landuse practices. Geosciences methods are particularly well suited to the study of landscape evolution in general and human landuse activities in particular. However, in their own fields (i.e. soil science, environmental studies), these methods are often applied narrowly to contemporary farming practices and recent changes to natural systems. Archaeological research expands both the temporal and behavioral range of case studies. For instance, recent research provides significant contributions to the processes of anthrosol formation and the temporality of human impacts in both plaggen and terra preta contexts.

Within archaeology, the reconstruction of paleolandscapes and the roles human agents played in their creation have long been central to archaeological interpretation, particularly for complex societies with intensive landuse practices. The explosion of interest in landscape archaeology in the last 10 years has yet to be linked up with concomitant geoarchaeological studies. These rich data sources are an important potential for the development of landscape approaches. In addition, geoarchaeological research is creating a more complex understanding of aboriginal landscape management in non-farming societies, further dispelling the myths of pristine unaltered landscapes before European colonization. We invite researchers to present their work on these and related themes in this session. We hope that contributors will draw out both the specifics of their methodologies as well as the theoretical implications of their results.

Papers