[Go to Parent Theme] [Previous Page] [SEARCH] [DAILY OUTLINES]

Shifting cultivation

Friday 4th July: 11:00 - 13:00
2 hour session: 5-10 minute position papers each followed by discussion

Tim Denham (Monash University, School of Geography and Environmental Science)
Robin Torrence (Australian Museum)
Peter J. Matthews (National Museum of Ethnology, Oska)

Abstract

The session will discuss theoretical and methodological issues concerning the origins and history of shifting cultivation in tropical environments. The aim is to take a critical appraisal at well entrenched ideas about how shifting cultivation fits within theories about agricultural origins and change. One widely accepted view is that this form of agriculture is widespread because it is perfectly suited to the soils and climate of tropical forests and, as such, it probably developed gradually out of low intensity forms of plant management. Secondly, shifting cultivation is generally thought to require low amounts of energy and therefore to precede permanent, labour intensive forms of agriculture. In contrast, William Denevan has made the radical proposal that without the use of metal tools, shifting cultivation is not the most energy-efficient way to exploit these environments, especially when compared to permanent agriculture based on soils renewed annually on flood plains. If he is correct, then we might expect shifting agriculture to develop out of more intense sedentary cultivation. We invite case studies across a wide range of tropical settings and time periods. These should examine the history of shifting cultivation and particularly the validity of Denevan's hypothesis and/or offer alternative models for shifting cultivation. The session will also address definitional and typological problems with describing shifting cultivation and methods for monitoring its occurrence, variation and change in the archaeological record.

Papers